Summary
Keywords
Full Transcript
In this video, we are going to start our slab series in Autodesk Robot, with the flat slab being the first to be investigated. Things that were missed: Engr. Donald Khanye: In the “Limit States” section of the “Slab and Shell Reinforcement” dialog box, I think it is important to also change or to choose the “Method” from “analytical” to “equivalent mom. (wood&Amor)” as a way to “tell” RSAP to calculate and design the slab reinforcements using the wood and amour equivalent moments as opposed to using the analytical moments results? CEE: Yes, that slipped my mind, although I took some effort to explain the method, it slipped my mind to select it. Links: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-wood-armer-method-concrete-slab-design-chanthoeun-chiv/ Current Video Ideas for the Future: - Highway Bridge - Basement Walls and the discontinuity of loads on columns - Influence Surfaces - When and why modal mass is always 90% or less. - Tie beams in normal structure. - More details about modal participation / report? - Masses and stiffnesses to control modes - LL Reduction in ACI/ASCE (vertical and horizontal) - A possible way to model columns with pressure areas - Deeper dive into slab reinforcement. - Raft with larger thickness and positions - Robot - seemingly - erratic deformation when supported by beams and columns - A way to manually “clean-up” simple mesh like the above - Complex and Principle results - Simple TBM tunnel lining analysis in robot Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 0:25 Slab Types 4:26 Modeling 5:16 Slabs Moment of Inertia 5:45 Modeling Cont'd 10:44 Results 13:07 Wood and Armer 18:30 Slab Required Reinforcement 28:40 Slab Provided Reinforcement 33:14 Some thoughts on the results 38:38 Outro
