Ethics & Moral Philosophy - What Should We Maximise? Peter Singer on Utilitarianism

Consequentialists hold that the right action is the one that brings about the best consequences. Some non-consequentialists also hold that, when choosing between actions that do not violate any non-consequentialist constraints, we should do what will bring about the best consequences, and other non-consequentialists hold that good consequences can sometimes outweigh non-consequentialist considerations. So on many ethical theories, it is important to decide what consequences are best. The answers offered to this question fall into three main categories. The classical utilitarians were hedonists, holding that “best consequences” means the greatest possible surplus of pleasure over pain. Preference utilitarians argue that the best consequences are those that do most to satisfy, on balance, the preferences of all those affected by our action. Pluralist consequentialists hold that there are several intrinsic values, not only pleasure or happiness, but also such things as knowledge, truth, beauty, freedom, equality and justice. In this lecture, Peter Singer discusses some of the considerations for and against each of these positions. This was given at Oxford in 2017 as part of a seminar in moral philosophy. Read more about utilitarianism and consequentialism: https://iep.utm.edu/consequentialism-utilitarianism/ #philosophy #ethics #utilitarianism #metaethics #moralphilosophy #petersinger