Course Hive
Search

Welcome

Sign in or create your account

Continue with Google
or
Metaphysical Objections to Normative Truth - Thomas Scanlon (2011)
Play lesson

Ethics & Moral Philosophy - Metaphysical Objections to Normative Truth - Thomas Scanlon (2011)

5.0 (6)
46 learners

What you'll learn

This course includes

  • 84.5 hours of video
  • Certificate of completion
  • Access on mobile and TV

Summary

Keywords

Full Transcript

Thomas M. Scanlon gives a talk on some objections to normative truth at a conference on the nature of normativity in 2011 at the Goethe University of Frankfurt. The idea that there are irreducibly normative truths about reasons for action, which we can discover by thinking carefully about reasons in the usual way, has been thought to be subject to three kinds of objections: metaphysical, epistemological, and motivational (practical). Metaphysical objections claim that a belief in irreducibly normative truths would commit us to facts or entities that would be metaphysically odd, incompatible, it is sometimes said, with a scientific view of the world. In this talk, Thomas Scanlon argues that the idea that there are irreducibly normative truths has no problematic metaphysical implications. Explaining why this is so requires an explanation of what "ontological commitment“ comes to. It also requires an explanation of the relation between normative facts and non-normative facts, and how normative facts can depend on ("supervene on“) non-normative facts without being reducible to them. #philosophy #metaethics #rationality #ontology #ethics #metaphysics

Course Hive

Continue this lesson in the app

Install CourseHive on Android or iOS to keep learning while you move.

Related Courses

FAQs

Course Hive
Download CourseHive
Keep learning anywhere