Course Hive
Search

Welcome

Sign in or create your account

Continue with Google
or
Plato’s Dualism | Arguments from Recollection & Affinity EXPLAINED
Play lesson

OCR A-Level Philosophy | Essential Videos for Exam Success - Plato’s Dualism | Arguments from Recollection & Affinity EXPLAINED

5.0 (3)
29 learners

What you'll learn

Design user interfaces with Figma prototypes
Write clean and maintainable JavaScript code
Implement CI/CD pipelines for automated deployment
Create data visualizations using Tableau

This course includes

  • 2.3 hours of video
  • Certificate of completion
  • Access on mobile and TV

Summary

Keywords

Full Transcript

👉 https://untanglephilosophy.com Did Socrates prove the immortality of the soul? Moments before his death, he presented arguments suggesting that death is far from the end. In this video, we explore Socrates’s Arguments from Recollection and Affinity as discussed in Plato’s dialogues, Phaedo and Meno. Socrates argues that learning is not a process of gaining new knowledge, but rather of recollecting what the soul already knows. Through the Argument from Recollection, he demonstrates that knowledge is inherent in the soul, unlocked through questioning and reflection. This is shown vividly when Socrates guides an uneducated slave to discover geometric truths, suggesting that the soul knew these truths before birth. In the Argument from Affinity, Socrates distinguishes between the physical, composite world and the eternal, non-composite world of the Forms. He claims that since the soul is akin to the Forms—unchanging and eternal—it must also be immortal. By contrasting the temporary nature of the body with the permanence of the soul, Socrates posits that the soul survives death, living on after the physical body decays. Perfect for University Courses & A-Level Philosophy & Ethics OCR & AQA or equivalent. 🔍 Key Points Covered Socrates’s Argument from Recollection and its implications for the immortality of the soul. The connection between recollection and learning as a process of rediscovering knowledge. Socrates’s use of questioning to reveal the soul’s pre-existing knowledge. The distinction between composite and non-composite things in Socrates's Argument from Affinity. How the soul, like the Forms, is eternal and unchanging, making it immortal. 📖 Chapters 00:00 Introduction 00:20 Argument from Recollection 01:06 The Proof: The Slave and Geometry 02:36 The Process of Learning as Recollection 03:01 Argument from Affinity 04:08 Conclusion 🔔 Subscribe for more philosophy content like this! 👍 Found this helpful? Share it with a friend who loves philosophy. 🗨️ What do you think of Socrates’s arguments? Drop a comment below—I’d love to hear your thoughts! 📷 instagram.com/untanglephilosophy 🎵 tiktok.com/@untanglephilosophy 📺 More Videos on Mind, Body & Soul https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnnvXJFiFDs&list=PL85Fs8yMgt8qMdXbWafjw5xObOseLfSGT 🔬 Sources and Further Reading Goetz, S. & Taliaferro, C. (2011) A Brief History of the Soul. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Kenny, A. (2010) A New History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Plato (2009) Meno. R. Waterfield (trans.). Reissued edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Plato (2009) Phaedo. D. Gallop (trans.). Reissued edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Waterfield, R. (2009) Meno & Other Dialogues. Reissued edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. #Plato #Dualism #Socrates #Recollection #ocr #alevel Code: BVGNHN4ACOAWYUJK

Course Hive

Continue this lesson in the app

Install CourseHive on Android or iOS to keep learning while you move.

Related Courses

FAQs

Course Hive
Download CourseHive
Keep learning anywhere