Course Hive
Search

Welcome

Sign in or create your account

Continue with Google
or
17. Backward induction: ultimatums and bargaining
Play lesson

Game Theory with Ben Polak - 17. Backward induction: ultimatums and bargaining

4.0 (3)
25 learners

What you'll learn

This course includes

  • 28.5 hours of video
  • Certificate of completion
  • Access on mobile and TV

Summary

Keywords

Full Transcript

Game Theory (ECON 159) We develop a simple model of bargaining, starting from an ultimatum game (one person makes the other a take it or leave it offer), and building up to alternating offer bargaining (where players can make counter-offers). On the way, we introduce discounting: a dollar tomorrow is worth less than a dollar today. We learn that, if players are equally patient, if offers can be in rapid succession, and if each side knows how much the game is worth to the other side, then the first offer is for an equal split of the pie and this offer is accepted. But this result depends on those assumptions; for example, bargaining power may depend on wealth. 00:00 - Chapter 1. Ultimatum Games: Why Backward Induction Fails Here 14:15 - Chapter 2. Bargaining Games: Setup and Generalization 47:44 - Chapter 3. Bargaining Games: Summary of Proof of Generalization 54:29 - Chapter 4. Bargaining Games: Assumptions and Conclusions Complete course materials are available at the Yale Online website: online.yale.edu This course was recorded in Fall 2007.

Course Hive

Continue this lesson in the app

Install CourseHive on Android or iOS to keep learning while you move.

FAQs

Course Hive
Download CourseHive
Keep learning anywhere